![\"\"](\"http:\/\/amazonnewsmedia.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/IMG_5310.png\")
<\/a>I felt a great deal of sympathy for this person. Her story indicated she had experienced severe cultic persecution by the Anthroposophists who control Steiner education. Gradually on DM she gave clues about the identity of a man she described as a “particularly<\/em>\u00a0dangerous, vengeful, sadistic malignant\/toxic narcissist<\/em>“.<\/p>\nThis man was also connected to the Steiner cult, and hence Anthroposophy. He had targeted her through her family, and she thought he may try and hurt me through targeting mine. Who wouldn\u2019t be scared by that?<\/p>\n
But when I used the clues she gave me to identify the person, she became angry. She began to subtly denounce me on Twitter using my initials in tweets, to create a kind of forced paranoia.<\/p>\n This is classic abuse by manipulation, a very cultic type of fake-news. She behaved publicly as if I had betrayed her in some way, presumably by privately telling her I was personally investigating her for publication. But she never said so publicly, because it wasn’t true: in fact we had both shared personal information during our exchanges.<\/p>\n Such are the dilemmas of being a participant documentarian. Once she started gabbing publicly it forced me to speak. I therefore published this DM I\u2019d sent – requesting her to cease trolling if that\u2019s what it was.<\/p>\n Once she blocked me, she curiously went off to deny it all to @steinermentary, an account she knows I can access.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Because having your family targeted by a dangerous, vengeful, sadistic malignant\/ toxic narcissist isn’t dangerous at all is it!<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n Targets of cultic manipulation and abuse are rightly suspicious and understandably paranoid.\u00a0It seems to be a characteristic of highly controlling groups that they organise their own critics<\/a> to manipulate others\u2019 beliefs, and evidence strongly suggests this.<\/p>\n If you can maintain an illusion of free-speech and transparency, while in fact undermining both,\u00a0of course<\/em> you can game democracy by running your own fake set of critics, or demonstrators. Once you’ve created the belief through fake-news, you can also do whatever you want to targets behind the scenes.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n No problem with investigative journalism or documenting here.<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n Honest praise or grooming behaviour? Only future actions by this person can reveal their true intention\u2026<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n We at ANM have now documented cult behaviours right into the establishment. We’ve proved that in any cultic environment, there is every likelihood that a person befriending you may actually be grooming you. And we’ve sadly proved that the judiciary will protect this.<\/p>\n So it all works for despotic Governments as much as for spiteful gangs of trolls.\u00a0And please let\u2019s not pretend that women as a group don\u2019t excel at this type of deception.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Fake-news is at the heart of all abuse. Abuse requires<\/i>\u00a0both deception and<\/em> grooming, and fake-news provides both. Fake-news can foster an illusion of free-speech, transparency and connection, behind which democracy can be destroyed by an army of unhelpful passive bystanders.<\/p>\n In these scenarios all are targets of grooming, not just any particular target of abuse. All the bystanders are also groomed by fake-news. That’s how they’re persuaded to suspend their disbelief to enable the abuse to take place, by coercion and threat if necessary. This is exactly how Savile operated.<\/p>\n And how useful is that now, to all those wishing to employ similar methods to hide other types of abuse in plain sight! The fact that Savile was such a rapacious paedophile, makes other types of grooming harder to see, and consequently easier to practise.<\/p>\n The level of Savile’s sang-froid then becomes seen just as extraordinary as his violent sexual deviance, almost a one-off. How convenient!<\/p>\n This in turn feeds the British love of “over thereism”: corruption and persecution happen in other places\/countries where people are less civilised, not at all like us.<\/p>\n But sometimes the mask slips a little.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Helena Kennedy – photo from Twitter.<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n Doughty Street Chambers recently trumpeted their feminism for International Women\u2019s Day.<\/p>\n As well as correcting street signs to reflect some forgotten influential women in history, their self-promoting festivities included the hashtag #Doughtystwomen. This then trended on Twitter, leading to even more self-congratulation.<\/p>\n Only one canny observer noticed that that hashtag only appeared in 1,150 tweets. How did it manage to trend on Twitter with so few mentions, and with no visible promotion?<\/p>\n <\/p>\n #Doughtstwomen practise the kind of feminism that ignores the serious professional misconduct, misogyny and fraud of one of their own barristers. In case 3SA90091 Jonathan Price abused his position<\/a> to deliberately degrade children’s Human Rights and fabricate a paedophile smear to hide cultic abuse. Price has\u00a0cashed in<\/a> on the currency of paedophilia.<\/p>\n The highly establishment women congratulating themselves have in fact been groomed into passive bystanding of abuse, and are now weaponised into active perpetrators of misogynist fake-feminist-news!<\/p>\n The #metoo moment is being loudly celebrated as ‘the end’ of abuse. Suspend your disbelief if you want to, I prefer my feminism rooted in reality and minus the sickly fake-news of redemptive womanhood.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n<\/a>I obviously defended my need to protect my family using my investigative skills. At this point she publicly announced that she had to unfollow and block me because of what I\u2019d just said to her privately (without saying what it was).<\/p>\n
\nFake Feminism = Fake News<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/a><\/a>Fake-News = Grooming<\/h4>\n
Is Fake-Feminism Trending?<\/strong><\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n
\n#methree<\/strong><\/h4>\n